We start with the camera panning into a New York apartment
building. We see a woman and a man talking. The man is ranting about the evils
of technology, and the women listens politely. Once the man has left the
apartment; she logs onto her online email. We quickly find out that the
underlying reason is that she is going online is to flirt with men, one
specific man in this case. On a whole the film succeeds as a romance.
The
makeup of the movie seems extremely similar to the earlier “Sleepless in Seattle.”
It has the same two leading actors, and, in fact, the same director. The two
have very different feels to them, however. “Mail may not be as romantic as Sleepless, but it's wittier.”(Millar,1) [1]. The story revolves around a man and
woman, who are both in competition with each other in the book industry. Meanwhile,
both continue to flirt online, without the slightest knowledge of each other. Halfway
through Tom Hank’s character figures out that he’s in competition with the
woman he’s been flirting with online. When he puts her out of business, he starts
hanging out with her, and flirting in person.
As compared to other love stories,
it’s lighter. Especially, when you compare it to its predecessor it’s less
heavy feeling. In “Sleepless in Seattle,” the opening is a graveyard which pans
up, and reveals that the main character’s
wife has died. “The coincidences that make the destined lovers' paths cross
aren't contrived with much finesse, but the characters get in some decidedly
clever lines.” (Alspector,1). [2]
The acting by Ryan, and Hanks
are superb. There is no real defining difference between the characters they’ve
done in previous movies, except they both work bookstores in this movie. I
think the good acting can be chalked up to the fact that both have played the
role before. Jack Mathews of the Los Angeles Times agrees saying “There's no
denying the chemistry between Hanks, whose comparisons to Jimmy Stewart are
becoming annoyingly accurate, and Ryan, whose schoolgirl cuteness is finally
taking on a layer of matured confidence.” (Mathews,1) .[3]
The film has seemed to make a
new mark outside of its director’s own
earlier classic. The acting has been well honed, it’s light, and it has some
amazing story development. It certainly has a lot of credence from other’s to
watch.
[1] Jeff
Miller . "You've Got Mail (1998) " Houstin Chronicle . Houstin
Chronicle , July 21, 2005. Web. October 3, 2012.
[2] Lisa Alspector . "You've Got Mail" Chicago
Reader. Chicago Reader, May 27, 2011. Web. 10/3/2012.
[3] Jack Mathews . "You've Got Mail (1998)" Los
Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, February 14, 2001. Web. 10/3/2012.
You speak a lot to "acting" here. And so I wonder. Is it good acting if you get to play the same role over and over again? (Possibly.) What nuances in the role stood out to you and to Hanks? Do either of them have a particular scene that works the best out of all the movies they've been in together (there's also Joe Versus the Volcano, right?)...
ReplyDelete